The Whitehall Ledger - Serving Southern Jefferson County in the Great State of Montana

By Jack H. Smith
Ledger Publisher 

Presentation looks at discharge act

 

Jack H. Smith

Attorney and Whitehall Chamber Vice President Edward J. Guza gives a presentation last week at the Borden's Building.

In his 18 years of practice, local attorney Edward J. Guza has always been interested in employment law.

Last week, Guza was able to share his expertise on the subject at a "Wrongful Termination and Employee Manuals Seminar" at the Borden's Building in Downtown Whitehall.

Guza spent a great deal of the presentation focusing on the Montana Wrongful Discharge Act. Guza said the MWDA was enacted in 1987 and a lot of employers do not know the act exists, and there are ways to utilize it to protect themselves.

Guza, who has offices in both Whitehall and Bozeman, said the MWDA is very unique to Montana, and the only other places where a similar version exists in United States territory are in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.

Guza stressed the importance of employers recognizing what is in the act. He said the act eliminates damages for pain and suffering, emotional distress, compensatory damages, punitive damages and any other form of damages not set forth in the act.

Guza went on to state that certain groups of employees are excluded from the act, including independent contractors, employees covered by a written collective bargaining agreement, and employees covered by a written contract of employment for a specific term.

Guza also discussed what constitutes a wrongful discharge. He said the act states it is a wrongful discharge, if it was in retaliation for the employee's refusal to violate public policy or for reporting a violation of public policy. Guza used the example of a boss asking an employee to put in a wrong number in financial documents. He said other wrongful discharges would be that it was not for good cause and the employee had completed the employer's probationary period of employment, and the employer violated the express provisions of its own written personnel policy.

Guza discussed personnel manuals and told those in attendance to question if they really need one. He said his office just started to use one, and it's important to include that the employer reserves the ability to revise the manual.

 

Reader Comments(0)

 
 

Our Family of Publications Includes:

Powered by ROAR Online Publication Software from Lions Light Corporation
© Copyright 2020